DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
620 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
620 KB
Summary
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, dated August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a discussion between MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE, addressing 'Your Honor,' regarding a defendant's alleged role in transporting 'Jane' to and from New Mexico. The central issue is whether these flights were intended for illegal sexual activity and if the defendant's actions constitute aiding and abetting, with the jury currently deliberating on these points for a potential conviction on Count Four.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Speaker |
Addressing 'Your Honor' and discussing the case details.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE during the legal proceeding.
|
| Jane |
A person whose flights and potential engagement in sexual activity are central to the case.
|
|
| defendant | Defendant |
Alleged to have aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight and potentially involved in illegal sexual conduct.
|
| MS. MOE | Speaker |
Addressing 'Your Honor' and providing legal argument regarding jury inference.
|
| jury | Jury |
The body deliberating whether the flight to New Mexico was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity and if intent c...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The entity responsible for transcribing the legal proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The destination of a flight and the location where alleged illegal sexual activity may have occurred.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"Your Honor, I think they've been fairly clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico. And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the flight to New Mexico."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing about the distinction between flights and their purpose in relation to the defendant's actions.)
DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and abetting that."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing that a jury could infer intent for aiding and abetting sexual conduct from the return flight.)
DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document