DOJ-OGR-00022040.jpg
751 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
751 KB
Summary
This document, an excerpt from a legal filing, discusses the importance of discovery and the production of exculpatory evidence in criminal cases, citing precedents from the Libby and Marshall cases. It details how courts have interpreted Rule 16 regarding material evidence, emphasizing that the government must produce relevant documents even if they originate from other agencies. The text also references a definition of material evidence from the United States v. Lloyd case.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Valerie Plame |
Mentioned in relation to a 'revenge issue' and as the wife of Ambassador Wilson.
|
|
| Ambassador Wilson | Ambassador |
Identified as Valerie Plame's 'late husband'.
|
| Libby | Defendant |
The defendant in a case where the Court ruled in favor of the defense regarding discovery.
|
| Marshall | Defendant |
The defendant in a drug-related transaction case, found guilty after newly discovered evidence was excluded, and whos...
|
| Lloyd |
A party in the case 'United States v. Lloyd', cited for a definition of material evidence under Rule 16.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Government agency |
Refers to the judicial body making rulings and decisions in the Libby, Marshall, and United States v. Lloyd cases.
|
| the government | Government agency |
Refers to the prosecution or government agents involved in the cases, arguing points of law and investigating.
|
| county public records | Government agency |
Source of local records about a traffic stop in the Marshall case.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Where defendant Marshall was incarcerated, and records of visitation were kept.
|
Relationships (1)
Ambassador Wilson is referred to as Valerie Plame's 'late husband'.
Key Quotes (3)
""all agencies""Source
— The Court (implied)
(The focus of the Court's decision in the Libby case, referring to agencies with information regarding offenses.)
DOJ-OGR-00022040.jpg
Quote #1
"'materially exculpatory,'"Source
— The government (argument)
(The government's argument in the Marshall appeal, which the Court rejected, regarding the standard for producing items.)
DOJ-OGR-00022040.jpg
Quote #2
"'as long as there is a strong indication that it will play an important role in uncovering admissible evidence, aiding witness preparation, corroborating testimony, or assisting impeachment or rebuttal.'"Source
— The Court (in United States v. Lloyd)
(The definition of 'material' evidence under Rule 16, as stated by the Court in United States v. Lloyd.)
DOJ-OGR-00022040.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document