DOJ-OGR-00002431.jpg
520 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
520 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, defends testimony given by Ms. Maxwell. It argues that her denial of awareness of "sexual activities" was truthful because the question's timeframe, "2000s," is ambiguous and can refer to a whole millennium. The document also asserts that questions about "massages" were immaterial and inadmissible in the defamation action because the term was not clarified as sexual or professional.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned as the person whose answer in testimony is being defended as "accurate and truthful" due to the ambiguity o...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Wiktionary | Online dictionary |
Cited as a source for the definition of "2000s" to support the argument that the term can refer to a millennium.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Ms. Maxwell gave testimony in a defamation action where she was questioned about "sexual activities" and "massages".
Ms. Maxwell
Questioner
Relationships (1)
The document describes a "questioner" posing questions to "Ms. Maxwell" during "quoted testimony" in a "defamation action".
Key Quotes (3)
"2000s (Noun) The millennium that began on January 1, 2000 and ends on December 31, 2999."Source
— Wiktionary
(A definition cited to argue that a question posed to Ms. Maxwell about the "2000s" was ambiguous.)
DOJ-OGR-00002431.jpg
Quote #1
"sexual activities"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002431.jpg
Quote #2
"massage"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002431.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document