EFTA00032667.pdf

106 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order
File Size: 106 KB
Summary

This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 16, 2021. The order addresses the sealing and redaction of twelve reply briefs filed by the Defendant; it mandates the immediate filing of unredacted briefs 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12, and sets a deadline of April 20, 2021, for justifications regarding redactions in the remaining briefs. The Judge emphasizes that a protective order alone is insufficient to justify sealing judicial documents.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the criminal case and the order regarding filing of briefs.
Alison J. Nathan District Judge
Judge issuing the order regarding sealing and redactions.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of New York
Court where the case is being heard.
United States of America
Plaintiff/Government in the case.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-03-15
Defendant filed reply briefs under seal.
USDC SDNY
2021-04-16
Court Order issued regarding the unsealing/docketing of reply briefs.
New York, New York
Judge Alison J. Nathan

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the court and where the order was signed.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Adversaries United States of America
Case caption: United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell

Key Quotes (3)

"The mere existence of a confidentiality agreement or a protective order covering judicial documents is insufficient to overcome the presumption of access."
Source
EFTA00032667.pdf
Quote #1
"The Defendant is ORDERED to docket Reply Briefs 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12 on ECF today"
Source
EFTA00032667.pdf
Quote #2
"If either side is seeking these or any other redactions to the remaining reply briefs, they must file a letter indicating the redactions they request and providing specific justifications"
Source
EFTA00032667.pdf
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document