DOJ-OGR-00018803.jpg
524 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
524 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. They are discussing the consistency of testimony from a witness named Carolyn, specifically focusing on a discrepancy in the date of an incident. The judge points out that a complaint states the incident occurred in 2002, while Carolyn's testimony places it in 2001.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination ("Carolyn - cross"). Her testimony is being discussed.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, addressing the court and discussing testimony.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, ruling on objections and clarifying points of evidence. Addressed as "your Honor".
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a court hearing about the consistency of a witness's (Carolyn's) testimony regarding the timeline of an incident. The court notes a discrepancy between a complaint (stating 2002) and testimony (stating 2001).
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court as "your Honor," indicating a formal, professional relationship between an attorney and a judge in a courtroom setting.
The document header states "Carolyn - cross," indicating that Mr. Pagliuca is likely an attorney conducting a cross-examination of Carolyn, who is a witness.
Key Quotes (2)
"the first incident described in this complaint took place in 2002, and her testimony is that it took place in 2001."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge summarizing the core inconsistency in the evidence and testimony that is being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00018803.jpg
Quote #1
"21 and 27. 27 is called incident two."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge clarifying which specific paragraphs or items of evidence are being referred to in the discussion.)
DOJ-OGR-00018803.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document