DOJ-OGR-00021051.jpg
682 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
682 KB
Summary
This document is a table of contents from a legal filing dated February 28, 2023, related to Case 22-1426. It outlines the arguments for an appeal on behalf of 'Maxwell', alleging multiple errors by the District Court, including the handling of 'Juror 50' in a post-trial hearing, constructively amending the indictment, and applying an incorrect sentencing guideline. The filing seeks to have the sentence vacated and the case remanded for resentencing.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Mentioned as the subject of a post-trial hearing regarding potential bias, prior abuse, and whether defense counsel w...
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the person convicted by the jury. The document outlines arguments that her conviction and sentence were ...
|
| Defense Counsel | Legal representative |
Mentioned as having been erroneously precluded by the Court from questioning Juror 50.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The District Court | Government agency |
Accused of abusing its discretion, erring in its findings regarding Juror 50, and erring in applying sentencing guide...
|
| The Court | Government agency |
Used interchangeably with 'The District Court', accused of erring in precluding Defense Counsel from questioning Juro...
|
Timeline (3 events)
Post-Trial Hearing, which the filing alleges the District Court conducted improperly.
A scheme to cause underaged girls to travel to New York with an intent to violate New York Law, described as the 'Core of Criminality' of Counts Three and Four.
New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the destination for underaged girls in a scheme that formed the 'Core of Criminality' for counts three a...
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a table of contents for a legal filing by Maxwell's counsel arguing that The District Court made multiple errors that prejudiced Maxwell's case, including abusing its discretion, erring in findings, and applying incorrect sentencing guidelines.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document