Legal Document - DOJ-OGR-00002248(1) | Trove Document Archive

Processing Document...

0%

Initializing...

Extraction Summary

4

People

3

Organizations

0

Locations

2

Events

1

Relationships

1

Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document

File Size: 692 KB

Summary

This legal document is a court's justification for ordering the pretrial detention of a defendant. The Court finds that the defendant has demonstrated a lack of candor, misrepresented her financial situation to Pretrial Services, and poses a significant flight risk. Despite a proposed $28.5 million bail package, the Court concludes that no conditions of release can reasonably assure her appearance, thus warranting her continued detention.

People (4)

Name	Role	Context
Defendant	Defendant	The subject of the court's analysis regarding pretrial detention, accused of lacking candor and being a flight risk.
Defendant's spouse	Spouse of the Defendant	Mentioned in relation to the Defendant's privacy concerns and as a co-signer on a proposed personal recognizance bond.
English		Referenced in a legal citation (English, 629 F.3d at 319) regarding the standard for proving a flight risk.
Mercedes		Referenced in a legal citation (quoting Mercedes, 254 F.3d at 436) within the citation for 'English'.

Organizations (3)

Name	Type	Context
Pretrial Services	government agency	The agency to which the Defendant allegedly misrepresented key facts.
the Court	government agency	The judicial body making the determination on the Defendant's pretrial detention.
the Government	government agency	The party arguing for the Defendant's detention, which the Court finds has met its burden of persuasion.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-07

The Defendant made representations to Pretrial Services that the Court later found to be woefully incomplete.

Defendant Pretrial Services

View

2020-12-30

The Court concluded that pretrial detention for the Defendant is warranted, finding she is a flight risk and has shown a lack of candor.

The Court Defendant The Government

View

Relationships (1)

Defendant → personal → Defendant's spouse

The document explicitly refers to the 'Defendant's spouse' and notes that the spouse would co-sign a proposed bond.

Key Quotes (1)

"a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant presents a risk of flight."

Source

— English, 629 F.3d at 319 (The legal standard the Government must meet to justify pretrial detention based on flight risk.)

DOJ-OGR-00002248(1).jpg

Quote #1