DOJ-OGR-00017818.jpg
530 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
530 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022. After a witness named Jane is excused, the court calls for a break. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, then raises a procedural issue, requesting a proffer from the government regarding the testimony of the next witness, Matt, to ensure it complies with evidence rules and avoids improper statements.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
States "No recross. Thank you." indicating the conclusion of a witness's testimony.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Addressed by the Court as she is excused from the stand after her testimony.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, excusing a witness, addressing the jury, and engaging in discussion with the attorneys.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Responds to the Court on behalf of the government, stating there are no matters to take up before the break.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Raises a legal matter concerning the upcoming testimony of the next witness, Matt.
|
| Matt | Witness |
Mentioned as the next witness to testify, whose testimony is the subject of a procedural discussion.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A witness, Jane, is excused from the stand following her testimony. The court calls for a mid-afternoon break for the jury. A legal discussion ensues between the judge and attorneys regarding the testimony of the next witness, Matt.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
Ms. Sternheim, an attorney, addresses the Court (the judge) to raise a legal matter concerning witness testimony.
Ms. Moe, an attorney for the government, responds to a question from the Court.
Key Quotes (1)
"I believe the next witness is Matt, whose issue was teed up yesterday. In advance of his testimony, just to make sure that it is compliant with the Federal Rules of Evidence, I would request that the government give a proffer of what he is going to say, as there are things in his 3500 material that did not come out on direct examination, and it would be improper for him to be able to testify as to things that are not prior consistent statements."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Raising a procedural issue to the judge regarding the scope of the next witness's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00017818.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document