DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
1.37 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
8
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.37 MB
Summary
This document is a docket sheet from a legal case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 12, 2021. It logs court activities from December 10 to December 18, 2020, including the filing of a conference transcript, orders regarding Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's decision to allow redactions based on established legal tests. The entries also note the filing of a letter and memorandum by Maxwell's counsel and a notice of appearance by an attorney for the USA.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the presiding judge who signed orders and before whom a conference was held.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the legal proceedings, including a conference transcript, bail applications, and court orders.
|
| Kristen Carannante | Court Reporter/Transcriber |
Listed as the court reporter for a conference held on 7/14/2020.
|
| McGuirk, Kelly |
Name associated with the entry of the transcript and notice of filing.
|
|
| Christian R. Everdell |
Addressed a letter to Judge Nathan on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding a renewed bail application and filed a me...
|
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Attorney |
Filed a notice of attorney appearance for the USA.
|
| Nixon |
Mentioned in the case citation Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PACER | Government Agency |
Mentioned as the system through which transcripts can be obtained after the restriction period.
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
|
| Warner Commc'ns, Inc. | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc.
|
| USA | Government Agency |
The party for whom attorney Andrew Rohrbach is appearing.
|
| The Government | Government Agency |
Mentioned as having filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail.
|
Timeline (8 events)
2020-07-14
A conference was held before Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. A transcript of this proceeding was later filed.
Court
Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge Alison J. Nathan
2020-12-10
A transcript of the 7/14/2020 conference was filed.
2020-12-10
A notice of filing of the official transcript from the 7/14/2020 conference was filed.
2020-12-14
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order adopting Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's proposed redactions for her renewed bail application, which was filed on December 8, 2020.
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Ghislaine Maxwell
2020-12-14
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell (via Christian R. Everdell) to Judge Nathan regarding the renewed bail application was entered.
2020-12-14
A Memorandum of Law with 24 exhibits was filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in support of her renewed motion for bail.
2020-12-17
A notice of attorney appearance was filed by Andrew Rohrbach for the USA.
2020-12-18
An order was issued regarding the Government's opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail, which was filed on December 16, 2020.
Court
Relationships (3)
Judge Nathan presides over proceedings involving Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and issues orders related to her case.
Christian R. Everdell submitted a letter and a memorandum of law on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
Andrew Rohrbach filed a notice of appearance for the USA, indicating he is representing the government in this matter.
Key Quotes (6)
"judicial documents"Source
— Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
(Part of a three-part test to determine if court documents can be sealed or redacted.)
DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
Quote #1
"balance competing considerations"Source
— Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
(The third part of a legal test for sealing or redacting court documents, weighing factors against the presumption of public access.)
DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
Quote #2
"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'"Source
— United States v. Amodeo
(Quoted in an order to explain the factors that can outweigh the public's right to access court documents.)
DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
Quote #3
"Amodeo II"Source
— Court
(A shorthand reference to the case United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044.)
DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
Quote #4
"'relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,'"Source
— United States v. Amodeo
(A quote used to define what qualifies as a 'judicial document' under the Lugosch test.)
DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
Quote #5
"Amodeo I"Source
— Court
(A shorthand reference to the case United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141.)
DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document