DOJ-OGR-00017341.jpg
593 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
593 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The attorney argues for a supplemental jury instruction concerning the territorial limits of New York law, which the judge rejects. The judge then raises concerns about potential trial interruptions from a health 'variant' and the need for jurors to plan for extended deliberations.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Addresses the court as 'your Honor' after the court speaks, suggesting he is an attorney involved in the case.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaking in a judicial capacity, ruling on a proposed jury instruction and managing the trial proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, indicating they are the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a trial about a rejected supplemental jury instruction and logistical concerns regarding jury deliberation due to health risks.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location of an activity that is central to a legal argument about jurisdiction and intent.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of its law, which an attorney argues cannot be violated by actions taking place in New Mexico.
|
Relationships (1)
The document records a formal, professional exchange between a judge (THE COURT) and an attorney (MR. EVERDELL) during a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"it requires an intent to violate New York law, and you can't violate this section of New York law in New Mexico."Source
— Unnamed speaker (presumably counsel)
(Arguing that activity in New Mexico cannot form the basis for a conviction under a specific New York law.)
DOJ-OGR-00017341.jpg
Quote #1
"I think the instruction is correct that I referred them to."Source
— THE COURT
(Justifying the rejection of a proposed supplemental jury instruction.)
DOJ-OGR-00017341.jpg
Quote #2
"in light of the variant, my concern about interruption of trial, given the increasing daily risk of exposure to either a juror or trial participant requiring quarantine, it is time to think to have the jurors make plans to continue deliberating until a verdict is reached."Source
— THE COURT
(Expressing concern over potential trial delays due to health risks and instructing that jurors should prepare for extended deliberations.)
DOJ-OGR-00017341.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document