DOJ-OGR-00018110.jpg
611 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
611 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the admissibility of video evidence. An attorney, Ms. Comey, argues that a video showing a photograph in the context of a master bedroom shared by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein should be admitted. The Court overrules an objection, agreeing that the video's context makes it different from the photograph in isolation and that it corroborates other testimony.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, arguing for the inclusion of a video as evidence.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as someone with whom the defendant shared a master bedroom.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, making a ruling on an objection.
|
| the defendant | Defendant |
Mentioned as having shared a master bedroom with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as making an argument regarding evidence placement.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A room that the defendant shared with Jeffrey Epstein, the context of which is shown in a video.
|
|
|
Location where photographs of naked people were allegedly present, according to testimony.
|
Relationships (2)
The document states that the defendant "shared" a master bedroom with Jeffrey Epstein.
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, I think the prejudice will be very restricted here. I do not intend to linger over the photograph or pause while playing it. It will just show the context of the full decorations of the area around the master bedroom that the defendant shared with Jeffrey Epstein."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Arguing that the prejudicial effect of a video is minimal and its purpose is to show context.)
DOJ-OGR-00018110.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm overruling the objection. I think the context is different than the photo in isolation."Source
— THE COURT
(Ruling on the admissibility of the video evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018110.jpg
Quote #2
"It is consistent with testimony regarding photographs of naked people in the house, it's corroborative of that."Source
— THE COURT
(Providing the reasoning for overruling the objection, stating the video corroborates other evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018110.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document