DOJ-OGR-00010746.jpg
737 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal filing (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size:
737 KB
Summary
This page is from a court order filed on June 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The judge denies the Defendant's request to redact statements related to victims Annie Farmer, Kate, and Giuffre, ruling that the documents are judicial records subject to public access under the First Amendment. The court argues that the Defendant's concerns do not outweigh the presumption of public access, noting that the Court (as decision-maker) can evaluate the submissions without prejudice.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Seeking redactions of statements; request denied. (Context implies Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number and victim ...
|
| Annie Farmer | Victim/Witness |
Defendant cited issues regarding her trial testimony.
|
| Kate | Victim/Witness |
Defendant cited issues regarding her trial testimony.
|
| Giuffre | Victim/Witness |
Virginia Giuffre; Defendant cited concerns about her credibility.
|
| Dr. Sours Edwards | Defendant in cited case |
Mentioned in case citation United States v. Sours Edwards regarding sentencing documents.
|
| Alcantara | Defendant in cited case |
Mentioned in case citation United States v. Alcantara regarding First Amendment rights.
|
| Sattar | Defendant in cited case |
Mentioned in case citation United States v. Sattar.
|
| Avenatti | Defendant in cited case |
Mentioned in case citation United States v. Avenatti regarding sealing documents.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
Denying the request for redactions.
|
|
| Government |
Mentioned regarding disclosure of issues.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, cited in case law.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York, cited in case law.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York (implied location of the court and cited cases).
|
Relationships (2)
Defendant seeking redactions regarding Farmer's testimony.
Defendant citing concerns about credibility with respect to Giuffre.
Key Quotes (4)
"This request for redactions is denied."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010746.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court has little difficulty concluding that the statements at issue are judicial documents to which the common law and First Amendment presumptions of public access attach."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010746.jpg
Quote #2
"The Defendant’s proffered justifications for sealing elide the reality that the decision-maker at this stage of proceedings is not a jury but the Court..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010746.jpg
Quote #3
"...the only accomplishment of the proposed redactions will be to obscure information from public view."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010746.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document