DOJ-OGR-00020864.jpg

333 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Note
File Size: 333 KB
Summary

This document is a handwritten note dated December 27, 2021, from an unknown individual (likely a juror) to Judge Nathan during the 'US v. Maxwell' trial. The author seeks clarification on Count Four, asking if the defendant can be found guilty for aiding in the transportation of a victim named 'Jane' to New Mexico if the intent to engage in sexual activity was on Jane's part, not the defendant's. The note highlights a point of confusion regarding the legal elements required for a conviction on that specific charge.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Judge Nathan Judge
The note is addressed to "Hello Judge Nathan,".
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned in the case name "US v. Maxwell" and referred to as "the defendant" in the note's question.
Jane Victim/Witness
Mentioned as the person whose flight was aided by the defendant: "transportation of Jane's return flight".

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
US Government
Mentioned in the case name "US v. Maxwell".

Timeline (2 events)

2021-12-27
The ongoing trial of US v. Maxwell, case number 20 CR 330 (AJN), during which this note was written.
Jane's return flight to New Mexico, which the defendant allegedly aided.
New Mexico

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the destination of a flight: "the flight to New Mexico".

Relationships (2)

Maxwell Defendant-Victim/Witness Jane
The note discusses the defendant (Maxwell) aiding in the transportation of Jane, which is central to a criminal charge (Count Four).
Unknown author Juror-Judge (inferred) Judge Nathan
The author addresses the judge directly with a specific legal question about jury instructions for a specific count in an ongoing trial, which is characteristic of a juror's note to a judge.

Key Quotes (1)

"Under Count Four (4), If the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico Where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"
Source
— Unknown author of the note (A question posed to Judge Nathan seeking clarification on the conditions for a guilty verdict under Count Four.)
DOJ-OGR-00020864.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document