DOJ-OGR-00010080.jpg
439 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
439 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript detailing testimony about the jury selection process. A witness explains why they and others decided not to further investigate a potential juror, Catherine Conrad, despite Ms. Trzaskoma raising a concern that she might be a suspended lawyer. The witness states that after reviewing Conrad's voir dire responses, they concluded it was a different person and found it "inconceivable" she would lie about her education.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein |
Appears as a name at the top of the transcript page.
|
|
| Catherine Conrad | Potential Juror |
Subject of the testimony; there was a concern she might be a suspended lawyer.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as the person who asked about doing further research on Catherine Conrad.
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Mentioned in reference to their voir dire responses, which were reviewed in relation to Catherine Conrad.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Appears at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency that produced the document.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A witness (A) is questioned (by Q) about the decision not to investigate potential juror Catherine Conrad further after concerns were raised about her being a suspended lawyer.
Unnamed Witness (A)
Unnamed Questioner (Q)
A discussion was held regarding Catherine Conrad's potential status as a suspended lawyer, prompted by Ms. Trzaskoma. The group reviewed voir dire responses and decided against further research.
Unnamed Witness (A)
Ms. Trzaskoma
Relationships (1)
Ms. Trzaskoma raised an issue with the witness and they discussed the matter of juror Catherine Conrad.
Key Quotes (3)
"All she said was there was a suspended lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad."Source
— Witness (A)
(Describing the initial information received about Catherine Conrad.)
DOJ-OGR-00010080.jpg
Quote #1
"We concluded that we did not believe they were the same person and we decided that we didn't need to do any more research at that point."Source
— Witness (A)
(Explaining the outcome of the discussion about Catherine Conrad.)
DOJ-OGR-00010080.jpg
Quote #2
"It was just inconceivable to me that she was a suspended lawyer. Why would she lie about her highest level of education?"Source
— Witness (A)
(Providing the reasoning for believing Catherine Conrad was not the suspended lawyer in question.)
DOJ-OGR-00010080.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document