DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg

976 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 976 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on Conrad's defiance of a previous court order from Judge Pauley to testify, her background as a suspended lawyer, and her mental health. Conrad is evasive, repeatedly stating she is not a psychologist, and provides minimal answers, including claiming she only takes "Water" as medication.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Conrad Witness
The individual being questioned under direct examination. Referred to as 'Ma'am' on page 120.
MR. OKULA Lawyer
A lawyer who makes objections during the testimony.
THE COURT Judge
The presiding judge in the hearing, who sustains and overrules objections and directs the witness to answer.
Judge Pauley Judge
A judge mentioned as having previously ordered the witness, Conrad, to appear at a hearing.
Clinton
Mentioned in the context of a potential "Clinton appointment" for Judge Pauley.
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS Defendant
Named in the case title, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Government
The plaintiff in the case against Paul M. Daugerdas.
U.S. marshals Government agency
Mentioned as having served a subpoena on the witness.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS Company
The court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (3 events)

2011-12-20
A prior hearing which the witness, Conrad, was compelled to attend.
Courtroom
2012-02-15
Direct examination of witness Conrad in the case of U.S. v. Daugerdas.
Courtroom
Conrad MR. OKULA THE COURT Questioning Lawyer
2012-02-15
A hearing concerning Conrad's role as a juror in United States v. Daugerdas, for which she was ordered to appear as a witness.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location where the testimony is taking place.

Relationships (3)

Conrad Legal Judge Pauley
Judge Pauley ordered Conrad to appear as a witness at a hearing. Conrad expressed defiance towards this order.
Conrad Legal THE COURT
Conrad is a witness being questioned in a hearing presided over by THE COURT. The Court directs Conrad to answer a question she initially refuses to.
MR. OKULA Professional THE COURT
Mr. Okula, a lawyer, makes objections to the Court during the testimony, which the Court either sustains or overrules.

Key Quotes (6)

"it's not going to happen"
Source
— Conrad (A statement the witness allegedly made regarding Judge Pauley receiving another appointment.)
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
Quote #1
"No, I don't. No, no, no"
Source
— Conrad (The witness's quoted initial response to being told she had to appear at a hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
Quote #2
"For what? I'm no, I'm not. I'm not going to court for testifying for anything, sir."
Source
— Conrad (The witness's quoted response when Judge Pauley gave instructions about retaining a lawyer.)
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
Quote #3
"I'm not going to"
Source
— Conrad (Quoted as a response a person might give to a judge's order to appear and testify.)
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
Quote #4
"I'm not showing up"
Source
— Conrad (Quoted as a response the witness gave to a federal judge's order to appear.)
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
Quote #5
"Water."
Source
— Conrad (The witness's one-word answer to the question, "What medications do you take?")
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
Quote #6

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document