DOJ-OGR-00016496.jpg
583 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
583 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, and the judge. Mr. Everdell seeks to admit property records showing the O'Neill family, not his client Ms. Maxwell, owned a property until 1997. This is intended to counter government testimony that Ms. Maxwell lived there starting in 1992, but the judge emphasizes that the key legal question is residence, not ownership.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel |
Speaking on behalf of the defendant, arguing to admit property ownership records.
|
| O'Neills | Property Owner |
Mentioned as the family who owned a property until 1997.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the discussion regarding her residence and property ownership. The government has testimony from her.
|
| Kate | Witness |
A person whose testimony is being discussed in relation to events that allegedly couldn't have happened.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Presiding over the court proceedings, referred to as THE COURT.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Represents the prosecution, presenting testimony against Ms. Maxwell.
|
Timeline (3 events)
1992
The government has testimony from Ms. Maxwell that she began living at a property in 1992.
2022-08-10
A legal argument between Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning property ownership versus residence.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by the court in a question about renting places.
|
Relationships (3)
The transcript notes "(Counsel conferred with defendant)", indicating Mr. Everdell is Ms. Maxwell's lawyer.
Mr. Everdell is an attorney arguing a point before the judge (THE COURT) in a formal court proceeding.
The government is presenting testimony against Ms. Maxwell in a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, the records show that the O'Neills owned that property until 1997, some family of the O'Neills, not Ms. Maxwell."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing that Ms. Maxwell did not own the property in question during the relevant time.)
DOJ-OGR-00016496.jpg
Quote #1
"The relevant question is residence. The government has testimony from Ms. Maxwell that she lived there beginning in 1992."Source
— THE COURT
(Focusing the legal argument on the issue of where Ms. Maxwell lived, rather than who owned the property.)
DOJ-OGR-00016496.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, I think the solution to this problem -- and this would not be a mini trial -- is for us to be able to admit the records showing the ownership records."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing a way forward to present his evidence to the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00016496.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document