DOJ-OGR-00018859.jpg
520 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
520 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. An unidentified attorney argues for the record that certain materials are not privileged, citing three reasons: no communication was required, potential disclosure to the government would waive privilege, and the intent to communicate to a third party negates privilege from the start. The judge acknowledges the argument but states that the court had already sustained an objection based on privilege.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney (implied) |
Responds to the court, stating, 'Not from the government, your Honor.'
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney (implied) |
Responds to the court, stating, 'No, your Honor.'
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (implied) |
Is addressed by the court regarding making a record on another issue.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presides over the hearing, sustains a privilege objection, and addresses the attorneys.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | Government agency |
Mentioned as a party to whom materials might be shown, which would cause them to 'lose any putative privilege'.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Identified as the court reporting service that created the transcript.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
An attorney makes a record arguing why certain materials are not privileged. The court confirms it sustained an objection on privilege and then addresses other attorneys present.
Courtroom in the Southern District (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court proceedings, as indicated by the name of the court reporting company.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Everdell addresses the court formally as 'your Honor'.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the court formally as 'your Honor'.
Key Quotes (4)
"I don't believe that that's privileged because there is no communication required, number 1."Source
— Unidentified Speaker
(The first of three points made to argue against a claim of privilege.)
DOJ-OGR-00018859.jpg
Quote #1
"Number 2, in the event those materials are shown to the government in a meeting, they lose any putative privilege that they may have."Source
— Unidentified Speaker
(The second point arguing against a privilege claim, related to disclosure to the government.)
DOJ-OGR-00018859.jpg
Quote #2
"Number 3, to the extent that they're intended to be communicated to a third party, they are not privileged to begin with, even if they're not shown to the third party."Source
— Unidentified Speaker
(The third point arguing against a privilege claim, related to intent to disclose to a third party.)
DOJ-OGR-00018859.jpg
Quote #3
"Again, you might have been able to get there, but the question that you asked, I sustained on privilege."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's response to the attorney's argument, clarifying the court's ruling.)
DOJ-OGR-00018859.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document