DOJ-OGR-00005857.jpg

675 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 675 KB
Summary

This legal document is the Government's response to a defense motion to exclude 'Government Exhibit 52,' a physical contact book. The Government clarifies that it will offer the physical book itself, not a scan from the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' civil case, and argues that the book's controversial acquisition history affects its weight, not its admissibility. The Government also contends the book is not hearsay because it is being used to prove the defendant kept contact information for victims, not to prove the accuracy of that information.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Guiffre Plaintiff
Mentioned as a party in the civil litigation 'Guiffre v. Maxwell'.
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as a party in the civil litigation 'Guiffre v. Maxwell'.
Jeffrey Epstein
A former employee of his attempted to sell Government Exhibit 52 to a civil lawyer suing him.
Al Farekh
Mentioned in a legal citation: 'See Al Farekh, 810 F. App’x at 24-25.'

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
The prosecuting party in the case, which obtained and seeks to use Government Exhibit 52 as evidence.

Timeline (3 events)

The defendant moves to exclude Government Exhibit 52.
defendant Government
Civil litigation case of Guiffre v. Maxwell, where a scan of Government Exhibit 52 was produced in discovery.
The Government acquired Government Exhibit 52 after a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein attempted to sell it.
Government former employee of Jeffrey Epstein civil lawyer suing Epstein

Relationships (2)

Guiffre legal adversaries Maxwell
They are opposing parties in the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell civil litigation'.
Jeffrey Epstein professional former employee
The document states that a 'former employee of Jeffrey Epstein' attempted to sell the exhibit.

Key Quotes (2)

"as part of discovery in Guiffre v. Maxwell civil litigation . . . with no explanation about its origin."
Source
— defendant (Quoted from the defendant's motion (Def. Mot. 7 at 1) describing how they believe the Government obtained Exhibit 52.)
DOJ-OGR-00005857.jpg
Quote #1
"particularly troubling"
Source
— defense (The defense's description of the history of the Government's acquisition of Government Exhibit 52 (Def. Mot. 7 at 2).)
DOJ-OGR-00005857.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document