DOJ-OGR-00009596.jpg
681 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
681 KB
Summary
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against the defendant's motion to vacate her conviction and dismiss the indictment. The Government contends that the conspiracies were distinct from those of Epstein, despite shared methods like grooming, and that the defendant has failed to prove her due process rights were violated by any pre-trial delay, as she has not shown actual prejudice.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio |
Mentioned as having testified at trial about the common use of grooming techniques among perpetrators of child sexual...
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as having committed crimes together with the defendant for years, but through different schemes.
|
|
| the defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the document, who is arguing for her conviction to be vacated and the indictment dismissed due to alle...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government | Government agency |
The prosecuting party in the case, arguing against the defendant's motions.
|
| The Court | Judicial body |
The judicial body that has previously evaluated and rejected the defendant's arguments and is being asked to deny the...
|
Timeline (2 events)
A trial occurred where Dr. Rocchio testified and the Government presented its case against the defendant.
The defendant filed a motion to vacate her conviction and dismiss the indictment based on alleged improper pre-trial delay.
The Court
Relationships (1)
The Government was clear at trial that, while the defendant and Epstein committed crimes together for years, they did so through different schemes, in violation of different laws.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document