EFTA00026705.pdf
320 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Memorandum opinion and order
File Size:
320 KB
Summary
Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order that would have allowed her to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases. The Judge ruled that Maxwell failed to show good cause or relevance for the disclosure. However, the Court permitted Maxwell to disclose specific facts to the relevant civil courts regarding the history of grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' and previous rulings by other courts ('Court-1' and 'Court-2') regarding those materials.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Seeking modification of protective order to use discovery materials in civil cases.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | District Judge |
Author of the Memorandum Opinion and Order; denies Maxwell's request.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned in the context of a grand jury investigation opened by the Government into him and possible co-conspirators.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue of the case.
|
|
| United States of America |
Opposing the modification of the protective order.
|
|
| Recipient |
An entity that received grand jury subpoenas and held materials responsive to them.
|
|
| Court-1 |
A court that permitted modification of a civil protective order to allow compliance with grand jury subpoenas.
|
|
| Court-2 |
A court that did not permit modification of a civil protective order.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2019-02-01
Government sought modification of civil protective orders to permit compliance with grand jury subpoenas.
Unknown Civil Courts
Government
2020-07-30
2020-09-02
Judge Nathan issues Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's request to modify protective order generally, but allowing specific limited disclosures.
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court and where the order was signed.
|
Relationships (2)
Document mentions grand jury investigation into 'Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators' in context of Maxwell case.
Government issued grand jury subpoenas to 'Recipient'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Defendant’s requests are DENIED."Source
EFTA00026705.pdf
Quote #1
"Grand jury subpoenas were issued to an entity ('Recipient') after the Government opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators"Source
EFTA00026705.pdf
Quote #2
"The Recipient concluded that it could not turn over materials responsive to the grand jury subpoena absent a modification of the civil protective orders in the civil cases"Source
EFTA00026705.pdf
Quote #3
"the threat that public disclosure of the redacted sections would interfere with an ongoing grand jury investigation"Source
EFTA00026705.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document