DOJ-OGR-00008932.jpg
627 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
627 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 11, 2022, discusses the background facts regarding jury instructions for Mann Act counts in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. It establishes that a conviction required proving an intent to violate a specific New York law (Penal Law § 130.55) and includes a court transcript clarifying this point, particularly in relation to the testimony of a witness named Kate.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kate | Witness |
Her testimony was the subject of a motion in limine by the defense, and is discussed in a court transcript regarding ...
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The document discusses the legal requirements for her conviction on Mann Act conspiracies.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in a transcribed courtroom exchange, clarifying legal points with counsel.
|
| MS. MOE | Counsel (implied) |
A speaker in a transcribed courtroom exchange, responding to the Court's questions on behalf of a party (likely the g...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, which confirmed the basis for conviction and is prosecuting Ms. Maxwell.
|
| the Court | Judicial body |
The entity providing limiting instructions and overseeing the trial.
|
Timeline (2 events)
The defense moved in limine to preclude Kate's testimony.
Court
A trial where the legal instructions to the jury regarding Mann Act counts were discussed.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location whose specific law (New York Penal Law, Section 130.55) must be violated for a conviction on the Mann Ac...
|
Relationships (2)
The document describes the government's prosecution of Ms. Maxwell and the legal arguments between the government and the defense.
Key Quotes (5)
"[I]f the only evidence in the case pertained to [Kate], if all the testimony of [Kate] is accepted by the jury, could the defendant be found guilty of any crimes charged in the indictment?"Source
— THE COURT
(Question posed during a courtroom exchange to clarify the legal sufficiency of evidence for a conviction.)
DOJ-OGR-00008932.jpg
Quote #1
"The answer is no.... With respect to the Mann Act conspiracies, the particular criminal sexual activity relates to a particular statute in New York...."Source
— MS. MOE
(Response to the Court, confirming that the charges are tied specifically to New York law.)
DOJ-OGR-00008932.jpg
Quote #2
"The particular statute in New York ... that’s [130.55] right?"Source
— THE COURT
(Seeking confirmation of the specific New York Penal Law section applicable to the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00008932.jpg
Quote #3
"Yes, your Honor."Source
— MS. MOE
(Confirming the specific statute to the Court.)
DOJ-OGR-00008932.jpg
Quote #4
"So the Mann Act ... the case that the government is going to prove here is going to incorporate that as the illegal sexual conduct."Source
— THE COURT
(Summarizing and confirming the government's legal theory for the Mann Act charge.)
DOJ-OGR-00008932.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document