DOJ-OGR-00019429.jpg

600 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 600 KB
Summary

This legal document describes the predicament of Ms. Maxwell, who is involved in both a civil and a criminal case presided over by two different judges, Judge Preska and Judge Nathan. A protective order in the criminal case, issued by Judge Nathan, prevents her from sharing relevant information with Judge Preska in the civil case. Her requests to both judges to resolve this issue have been denied, placing her in what the document calls a 'Catch-22 situation'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Litigant
Subject of the document, involved in multiple legal cases (Giuffre v. Maxwell, United States v. Maxwell) and is descr...
Judge Preska Judge
Presiding over the unsealing of materials in a civil case. Denied Ms. Maxwell's request for a stay.
Judge Nathan Article III judge
Issued a protective order in a criminal case involving Ms. Maxwell and denied her request to share information with J...
Giuffre Litigant
Party in the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
United States government agency
Party in the 'United States v. Maxwell' case.

Timeline (3 events)

Unsealing of materials subject to a civil protective order in a case involving Ms. Maxwell.
Giuffre v. Maxwell
this Court
United States v. Maxwell

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context of the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' panel.

Relationships (4)

Ms. Maxwell professional Judge Preska
Judge Preska is presiding over a case involving Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Maxwell made a legal request to Judge Preska, which was denied.
Ms. Maxwell professional Judge Nathan
Judge Nathan is presiding over a criminal case involving Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Maxwell made a legal request to Judge Nathan, which was denied.
Judge Preska professional Judge Nathan
They are described as 'co-equal Article III judge[s]' presiding over related cases involving the same individual, Ms. Maxwell.
Giuffre adversarial Ms. Maxwell
They are opposing parties in the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' lawsuit.

Key Quotes (1)

"there was no factual basis to grant a stay"
Source
— Judge Preska (Stated as the reason for denying Ms. Maxwell's request to stay the unseal proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00019429.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document