DOJ-OGR-00017258.jpg
633 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
633 KB
Summary
This legal document is a page of jury instructions from a court case involving Ms. Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury on how to assess witness credibility, clarifying that the use of pseudonyms for witness privacy should not influence their evaluation. It specifically details Instruction No. 45, which states that a witness's prior inconsistent statement should only be used to judge the credibility of their trial testimony, not as direct evidence of Ms. Maxwell's guilt.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned in the context of evidence bearing on her guilt.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
A judge provides instructions to the jury regarding the evaluation of witness credibility, specifically addressing the use of pseudonyms for witnesses and how to consider prior inconsistent statements.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
Relationships (1)
The document outlines how a witness's testimony and credibility should be evaluated by the jury in relation to determining Ms. Maxwell's guilt.
Key Quotes (2)
"I instruct you again that this process should not bear in any way on your evaluation of the evidence or credibility of any witness in this case."Source
— Judge (implied)
(Instruction to the jury regarding the use of pseudonyms for witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00017258.jpg
Quote #1
"Evidence of a prior inconsistent statement is not to be considered by you as affirmative evidence bearing on Ms. Maxwell's guilt."Source
— Judge (implied)
(Instruction No. 45, explaining the limited purpose for which a witness's prior inconsistent statement can be considered.)
DOJ-OGR-00017258.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document