DOJ-OGR-00021817.jpg

633 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 633 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of an appeal, addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's claims that her trial was unfair and her sentence unreasonable. The court rejects her argument that evidence of her conduct in New Mexico was prejudicial, noting the evidence was disclosed weeks before trial. The document also affirms that her 240-month sentence, which included a leadership enhancement, was procedurally reasonable.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned throughout the document as the defendant appealing her conviction and sentence. She is stated to have trans...
Jane Victim
Mentioned as a victim who was transported to New York by Maxwell for sexual abuse and who suffered abuse in New Mexico.
Epstein Co-conspirator
Mentioned in a footnote as having a ranch in New Mexico and being involved with the Defendant (Maxwell) in a scheme t...
Lebedev Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Lebedev' in footnote 50.
Dove Party in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Dove, 884 F.3d at 149' in footnote 48.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
District Court Government agency
Mentioned as the court that found Maxwell guilty, applied a sentencing enhancement, and issued her sentence.

Timeline (4 events)

Maxwell transported Jane to New York for sexual abuse.
New York
Abuse suffered by Jane in New Mexico.
New Mexico
Maxwell's criminal trial, for which she received evidence (notes of Jane's interview) over three weeks prior.
The District Court sentenced Maxwell to 240 months' imprisonment, a term slightly above the calculated Guidelines range of 188 to 235 months.
District Court

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location where Maxwell transported Jane for sexual abuse and where the Indictment charged a scheme to sexually abuse ...
Location where Maxwell's conduct occurred, where Jane suffered abuse, and the location of Epstein's ranch.
Mentioned in a footnote as a location where victims were groomed for abuse.

Relationships (2)

Maxwell Perpetrator-Victim Jane
The document states that 'Maxwell transported Jane to New York for sexual abuse' and that Jane suffered abuse in New Mexico as part of Maxwell's conduct.
Maxwell Co-conspirators Epstein
A footnote states that the Indictment alleged 'that Epstein and the Defendant [Maxwell] groomed the victims for abuse at various properties'.

Key Quotes (5)

"materially different"
Source
— Maxwell (argument) (Used to describe Maxwell's argument that the evidence presented was different from the allegations in the Indictment.)
DOJ-OGR-00021817.jpg
Quote #1
"substantial prejudice."
Source
— Legal standard (A legal standard that Maxwell failed to demonstrate regarding the evidence of her conduct in New Mexico.)
DOJ-OGR-00021817.jpg
Quote #2
"unfairly and substantially"
Source
— Legal standard (The document concludes Maxwell was not 'unfairly and substantially' prejudiced by the evidence presented at trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00021817.jpg
Quote #3
"[t]he Indictment charged a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls in New York. In service of this scheme, the Indictment alleged that Epstein and the Defendant groomed the victims for abuse at various properties and in various states, including Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico."
Source
— District Court (A finding by the District Court, quoted in a footnote, explaining the scope of the indictment against Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00021817.jpg
Quote #4
"[t]he government disclosed the evidence and exhibits . . . four weeks prior to trial"
Source
— Finding in United States v. Lebedev (Quoted in a footnote from a previous case to support the conclusion that timely disclosure of evidence prevents a finding of unfair prejudice.)
DOJ-OGR-00021817.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document