DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
669 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
7
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
669 KB
Summary
This legal document details a court's finding that Juror 50 is credible, despite inconsistencies in his jury selection questionnaire. The court analyzed a supportive comment the juror made on Twitter to Annie Farmer, concluding it did not contradict his testimony about not widely discussing his own sexual abuse. Ultimately, the court determined the juror's errors were not intentional deception and he would not have been dismissed for cause had he answered accurately.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
The subject of the court's analysis regarding credibility, testimony, and answers on a jury selection questionnaire.
|
| Annie Farmer |
The recipient of a comment from Juror 50 on Twitter.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (1)
Juror 50 commented on a Twitter post by Annie Farmer in January 2022.
Key Quotes (7)
"was brave enough to come forward"Source
— Juror 50
(A comment made by Juror 50 to Annie Farmer on Twitter.)
DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
Quote #1
"thank[ing] her for sharing her[] [story] as well."Source
— Juror 50
(A comment made by Juror 50 to Annie Farmer on Twitter.)
DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
Quote #2
"randomly seen"Source
— Juror 50
(His explanation for how he came across Annie Farmer's post.)
DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
Quote #3
"felt like [he] wanted to comment."Source
— Juror 50
(His explanation for why he commented on Annie Farmer's post.)
DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
Quote #4
"two followers"Source
— Juror 50
(Describing his Twitter account at the time he made the comment.)
DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
Quote #5
"were random things"Source
— Juror 50
(Describing his two Twitter followers.)
DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document