HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027788.jpg

859 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Message log / digital forensic report
File Size: 859 KB
Summary

This document is a digital forensic log of text messages exchanged between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes') and a redacted individual in late June 2019, shortly before Epstein's arrest. The conversation includes a check-in on Epstein's well-being ('U ok?') and a specific discussion regarding Israeli politics, questioning if 'Ehud' (likely former PM Ehud Barak) will become Prime Minister again, noting that the outcome 'depends on coalition.' The document originates from House Oversight Committee files.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Sender (inferred)
Identified by email alias 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com'. Discussing developments and political figures.
[Redacted] Sender/Recipient
Person communicating with Epstein, checking if he is okay ('?? U ok?'). Name is redacted by a black bar.
Ehud [Barak] Subject of discussion
Mentioned in the query 'Will Ehud Be PM' (Prime Minister). Refers to Israeli politician Ehud Barak.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-06-30
Discussion regarding Israeli politics and Ehud Barak's potential to become Prime Minister.
Unknown
Jeffrey Epstein Unknown Correspondent

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Political/Social Interest Ehud [Barak]
Epstein inquires 'Will Ehud Be PM' and discusses his political chances.
Jeffrey Epstein Correspondent [Redacted]
Exchange of personal messages; Redacted person asks about Epstein's well-being ('U ok?').

Key Quotes (5)

"Your math guys are not that worldly."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027788.jpg
Quote #1
"?? U ok?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027788.jpg
Quote #2
"Will Ehud Be PM"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027788.jpg
Quote #3
"He is not to be underestimated."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027788.jpg
Quote #4
"Unlikely top job. But depends on coalition."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027788.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document