DOJ-OGR-00017940.jpg
614 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
614 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, and the judge ('THE COURT') after the jury has been excused for a break. Ms. Pomerantz seeks to clarify the record regarding the scope of Dr. Rocchio's testimony, stating the government's understanding that his opinion on the presence of a third party was excluded, and distinguishing this from the defense's theory of 'grooming by proxy'.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Dr. |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a 'Direct' examination. Ms. Pomerantz refers to 'Dr. Rocchio's opinion' and...
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, addressing the Court ('your Honor').
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, addressed as 'your Honor'. Directs the jury and the proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A portion of a court trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where, after a witness's testimony, an attorney (Ms. Pomerantz) clarifies a point of evidence with the judge regarding the scope of that testimony.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Ms. Pomerantz formally addresses the Court as 'your Honor' within a legal proceeding to discuss matters of evidence and testimony.
Ms. Pomerantz discusses the testimony and opinions of 'Dr. Rocchio', indicating she is likely an attorney who has examined him as a witness.
Key Quotes (2)
"Your Honor, I just wanted to note, the government understood that the Court's opinion excluded Dr. Rocchio's opinion regarding the presence of a third party."Source
— MS. POMERANTZ
(Addressing the judge to clarify the scope of admissible testimony from Dr. Rocchio.)
DOJ-OGR-00017940.jpg
Quote #1
"And on page 73, I had asked a question about whether there was anything about what you're testifying about here that says that grooming can only be done for the benefit of the person doing the grooming, to which Dr. Rocchio responded, No, there's not."Source
— MS. POMERANTZ
(Recounting a previous exchange from the trial transcript to the judge to support her point.)
DOJ-OGR-00017940.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document