DOJ-OGR-00021572.jpg
543 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
543 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, capturing a dialogue between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and the Court. Mr. Everdell argues against sentencing enhancements for his client, challenging the reliability of evidence like an 'unreliable message pad' and contesting the government's claim that the defendant received $7 million in 2007. The discussion revolves around the applicable sentencing guidelines, specifically whether the 2003 guidelines should be used based on the conspiracy's end date in 2004.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the Court on behalf of a defendant regarding sentencing guidelines.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Title used by Mr. Everdell to address the judge presiding over the case.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
Refers to the judicial body/judge presiding over the case. Acts as a speaker in the transcript.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2004-11/2004-12
The end of a conspiracy, which is argued to have occurred in November or December of 2004, affecting which sentencing guidelines should apply.
2023-06-29
A court proceeding where Mr. Everdell and the Court discuss sentencing factors, guidelines, and evidence.
Relationships (1)
The dialogue shows a formal, professional interaction between an attorney (Mr. Everdell) and a judge (THE COURT) during a legal proceeding. Mr. Everdell addresses the judge as 'Your Honor'.
Key Quotes (4)
"And this one uncorroborated, unadmitted, unreliable message pad is not sufficient for that purpose."Source
— Mr. Everdell (implied)
(Arguing against the reliability of a piece of evidence being used as a sentencing factor.)
DOJ-OGR-00021572.jpg
Quote #1
"Therefore, the 2003 guidelines must apply."Source
— Mr. Everdell (implied)
(Concluding an argument that a conspiracy ended in 2004, which would necessitate the use of the 2003 sentencing guidelines.)
DOJ-OGR-00021572.jpg
Quote #2
"Okay. I have a question about the leadership enhancement, as I said, but anything else you want to raise that you didn't have the opportunity to raise in your papers, Mr. Everdell?"Source
— THE COURT
(Addressing Mr. Everdell to allow him to raise new points not covered in his written submissions.)
DOJ-OGR-00021572.jpg
Quote #3
"In that section, the government made reference to an argument that the defendant was receiving money into the 2007 time period. I believe they pointed to $7 million. I think that is an extreme stretch,"Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Contesting a government claim about a financial transaction involving the defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00021572.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document