DOJ-OGR-00017950.jpg
592 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
592 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the presiding judge. They discuss the permissible scope of cross-examination, with the judge warning against introducing new, undisclosed expert testimony. The judge references a prior Daubert hearing and instructs another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, to object if the rules are violated.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
A speaker in the court transcript, arguing the scope of his cross-examination with the judge.
|
| The Court | Judge |
A speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the hearing and setting rules for cross-examination. Referred to as...
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney |
Addressed by the Court, who instructs her to object if Mr. Pagliuca attempts to insert undisclosed expert testimony.
|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of the direct examination ('Rocchio - Direct'), implying they are the witness ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A dialogue between Mr. Pagliuca and the Court regarding the scope of cross-examination of a witness (Rocchio). The discussion references a prior Daubert hearing and the rules against introducing undisclosed expert testimony.
Courtroom (implied)
A prior hearing mentioned in the transcript where literature and the scope of examination were discussed.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney arguing a point before the judge (The Court) in a formal court proceeding.
The Court addresses Ms. Pomerantz directly, instructing her on a legal procedure (objecting), indicating she is an attorney involved in the case.
Key Quotes (3)
"much of my cross-examination is similar to that which was -- that occurred that your Honor pointed out during the hearing was -- may be appropriate in front of a jury."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Explaining to the judge the nature of his intended cross-examination questions, referencing a prior comment by the judge.)
DOJ-OGR-00017950.jpg
Quote #1
"I understand the concern, at least with respect to suggestive memory. We've established there's some fair grounds to cross to make sure she's considered other bases."Source
— THE COURT
(Acknowledging the legitimacy of some cross-examination while setting boundaries.)
DOJ-OGR-00017950.jpg
Quote #2
"I won't allow insertion of undisclosed expert testimony via cross-examination questions, and you won't do that. And you'll object, Ms. Pomerantz, if so."Source
— THE COURT
(Issuing a direct order to Mr. Pagliuca and instructing Ms. Pomerantz on how to respond to a violation.)
DOJ-OGR-00017950.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document