DOJ-OGR-00004884.jpg
760 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
760 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that a defendant's level of sophistication is an irrelevant and unfair metric for determining the reasonableness of their reliance on legal advice or prosecutorial decisions. It uses the case of Cosby, who, despite his wealth and media savvy, reasonably relied on District Attorney Castor's public promise not to prosecute, which resulted in Cosby providing self-incriminating testimony. The document asserts that Castor made this decision knowing it would induce Cosby's reliance.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Cosby | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant who relied on a prosecutor's public announcement not to prosecute, leading him to provide ...
|
| D.A. Castor | District Attorney |
The District Attorney who made a public announcement that Cosby would not be prosecuted, knowing this would induce Co...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth | Government entity |
The governmental body on whose behalf District Attorney Castor made the decision not to prosecute Cosby.
|
Timeline (2 events)
D.A. Castor announced his declination decision not to prosecute Cosby on behalf of the Commonwealth.
Relationships (1)
The document details Cosby's reliance on D.A. Castor's public announcement not to prosecute. It states Castor knew his decision would induce Cosby's reliance and lead to his testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document