DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
555 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
555 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and a judge regarding specific wording changes in a legal document. Mr. Everdell proposes omitting the phrase 'or foreign,' suggests replacing 'an individual' with 'Jane' to specify Count Two, and reiterates a previously overruled objection to the word 'coerced.' The Court accepts some changes while confirming others have been overruled, thereby refining the document's language for the case.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney/Counsel |
Speaking to the court to propose and discuss edits to a legal document.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, responding to Mr. Everdell's proposed edits, and making rulings.
|
| Jane | Individual involved in the case |
Mentioned as the sole subject of "Count Two" for the period 1994 to 1997. Mr. Everdell proposes replacing the term "a...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding specific wording changes to a legal document for a case, specifically on pages 20 and 21.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (1)
The document records a formal dialogue where Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'your Honor' within a legal proceeding to discuss edits to a court document.
Key Quotes (3)
"Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time period 1994 to 1997,"Source
— Unidentified Speaker (quoted)
(A phrase being added to a document to clarify the scope of Count Two.)
DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
Quote #1
"we would propose replacing "an individual" with the word "Jane.""Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing an edit on page 21, while acknowledging that the court has already overruled this suggestion.)
DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
Quote #2
"On line 6 we would just reiterate our objection to the word "coerced." I understand that's been overruled."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Formally restating an objection for the record, despite it having been previously overruled by the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document