DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg

570 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 570 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge. Ms. Moe is seeking to admit three spiral-bound message books as evidence, arguing they have been properly authenticated and should be admitted despite a hearsay objection, citing that similar evidence was previously accepted in the trial.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Hesse
Mentioned in the header, likely a witness under direct examination.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the trial, speaks on lines 3, 13, and 14.
MS. MOE Attorney
Speaking to the court, arguing for the admissibility of evidence on lines 4 and 15.
Your Honor Judge
A title used by Ms. Moe to address the court.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion between an attorney (Ms. Moe) and the judge (THE COURT) regarding the admissibility of three spiral-bound message books as evidence, specifically addressing authentication and hearsay objections.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."

Relationships (1)

MS. MOE professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe, an attorney, is addressing 'THE COURT' (the judge) in a formal legal proceeding, arguing for the admission of evidence.

Key Quotes (4)

"You may be seated. Okay."
Source
— THE COURT (Addressing someone in the courtroom after a witness was excused.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #1
"Thank you, your Honor. These three exhibits are spiral bound message books. As their appearance makes clear, no one could tear an object out or put it in there, and so they are a continuous record."
Source
— MS. MOE (Describing the exhibits she is seeking to have admitted into evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #2
"I didn't hear an authentication objection. It was hearsay."
Source
— THE COURT (Clarifying the nature of the objection to the evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #3
"With respect to hearsay, these are admissible for the same reasons the other message pads are admissible and received. They are phone messages that record the date and time of a person calling."
Source
— MS. MOE (Arguing against the hearsay objection by citing precedent from earlier in the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document