DOJ-OGR-00011541.jpg

604 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 604 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and a government attorney (MS. MOE). The discussion centers on the legal end date of a conspiracy, with the government arguing it extended through 2004 and into 2005. The judge expresses concern that the evidence cited by the government is 'post conspiracy' because it falls after the date in the indictment and, crucially, after a person named Carolyn turned 18, an event upon which the conspiracy's continuation was legally dependent.

People (3)

Name Role Context
MS. MOE Attorney
A speaker in the court transcript, arguing on behalf of the government's position regarding the conspiracy's end date.
THE COURT Judge
A speaker in the court transcript, questioning the government's use of post-conspiracy evidence.
Carolyn
A person whose 18th birthday is a key temporal marker in the discussion of the conspiracy's timeline.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (3 events)

2004-2005
A conspiracy that the government argues was ongoing through all of 2004 and into 2005.
A discussion in court regarding the end date of a conspiracy and the admissibility of evidence from November and December 2004.
Southern District Court
Carolyn's 18th birthday, which is a significant event for determining the timeline and legal status of the conspiracy.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporters, indicating the location of the court proceedings.

Relationships (1)

THE COURT Professional MS. MOE
The document is a transcript of a formal court proceeding where Ms. Moe, an attorney, is addressing the judge ('your Honor').

Key Quotes (3)

"It exceeds also the date of Carolyn's 18th birthday. And so it's not just what the indictment charges -- but by a conspiracy that is dependent here on Carolyn being under 18 for its continuation."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge explaining why the evidence being presented by the government is considered post-conspiracy.)
DOJ-OGR-00011541.jpg
Quote #1
"We're relying on evidence that exceeds the date in the indictment, but it --"
Source
— MS. MOE (The government's lawyer acknowledging that the evidence used falls outside the timeframe specified in the indictment.)
DOJ-OGR-00011541.jpg
Quote #2
"And here the trial evidence was that the conspiracy was ongoing through all of 2004 and into 2005."
Source
— MS. MOE (The government's lawyer stating their position on the duration of the conspiracy based on trial evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00011541.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document