DOJ-OGR-00019579.jpg
519 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
519 KB
Summary
This legal document is a letter dated August 24, 2020, from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. The letter argues that his client, Ms. Maxwell, has demonstrated good cause to present a discrete set of sealed materials to judicial officers, countering that any argument of compromising grand jury secrecy is 'absurd'. Pagliuca asserts that the government has failed to provide a valid reason for withholding this information from other judicial officers.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | The Honorable |
The recipient of the letter, presumably a judge.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
A party in a legal proceeding who seeks to disclose sealed materials to judicial officers.
|
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca |
The author and signatory of the letter.
|
|
| Kerik |
A party in a cited legal case (Kerik, 2014 WL 12710346).
|
|
| Amodeo |
A party in a cited legal case (United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141).
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned as having obtained an ex parte order to subpoena information and has not articulated a reason for keeping i...
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-08-24
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca sent a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell's request to disclose sealed materials.
prior to 2020-08-24
The Government obtained an ex parte order to subpoena information related to the Civil Litigation involving Ms. Maxwell.
Government
Ms. Maxwell's opponent
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a legal citation (Southern District of New York).
|
Relationships (3)
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca is writing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing for her request to be granted, suggesting an attorney-client relationship.
The document explicitly refers to an 'opponent in the Civil Litigation'.
The letter argues against the government's position, stating 'The government has not articulated a cogent reason for that information to be kept from the other judicial officers.'
Key Quotes (1)
"‘relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process.’"Source
— Kerik, 2014 WL 12710346 (quoting United States v. Amodeo)
(A legal standard for what constitutes a judicial document, cited in the letter.)
DOJ-OGR-00019579.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document