HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015906.jpg

1.53 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book excerpt / investigative document
File Size: 1.53 MB
Summary

This document appears to be page 216 from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', included in a House Oversight Committee document production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015906). The text is an educational explanation of cryptography, specifically describing the mechanics, security, and historical context (referencing Claude Shannon and Bell Corp) of the 'one-time pad' encryption method. While the document is part of an investigation file, the content itself is theoretical and instructional regarding secure communications.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Claude Shannon Mathematician/Cryptographer
Proved the security of the one-time pad method while working for Bell Corporation.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Bell Corporation
Employer of Claude Shannon during World War II.
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015906' at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (2 events)

1945
Claude Shannon proves the one-time pad is perfectly secure.
Bell Corporation
1948
Publication of Claude Shannon's proof regarding one-time pads (delayed due to wartime secrecy).
N/A

Locations (2)

Location Context
Used as a hypothetical location in an example about message length security.
Used as a hypothetical bombing target ('Bomb Bath') in an example.

Relationships (1)

Claude Shannon Employment Bell Corporation
Claude Shannon proved this in 1945 while working for Bell Corporation

Key Quotes (3)

"One perfect way to encode a message is to use a one-time pad."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015906.jpg
Quote #1
"This code is unbreakable – almost!"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015906.jpg
Quote #2
"Claude Shannon proved this in 1945 while working for Bell Corporation but, due to wartime secrecy, his proof was not published until 1948."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015906.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document