Trove
Sign In Get Started

DOJ-OGR-00014718.jpg

563 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 563 KB
Summary

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where the judge addresses a letter from the defense. Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, points out that the letter rehashes an argument the Court already rejected the previous day. The judge affirms this, stating that the legal instructions given to the jury were correct and remain so, thereby dismissing the defense's implicit challenge.

People (2)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Speaker in the transcript who received a letter from the defense and makes a ruling on it.
Ms. Moe Unknown, likely an attorney
Speaker in the transcript who addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and comments on the defense's letter.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-09
The defense advanced an argument which the Court considered and rejected. The Court also referred the jury to a legal instruction in the afternoon.
Courtroom
The Court defense jury
View
2022-08-10
A discussion in court without the jury present regarding a letter submitted by the defense.
Courtroom
The Court Ms. Moe
View
last week (relative to 2022-08-10)
The Court provided a legal instruction to the jury.
Courtroom
The Court jury
View

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jury room
Mentioned by Ms. Moe as having its door open.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Moe → Professional → The Court
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and they discuss legal matters in a formal court setting.
The Court → Adversarial (Legal) → defense
The Court is ruling on a letter and argument submitted by the defense, which it ultimately rejects.

Key Quotes (2)

"With respect to the defendant's letter, this is essentially the same argument that the defense advanced yesterday, which the Court carefully considered and rejected. Nothing has changed between then and now."
Source
— Ms. Moe (Responding to the Court's mention of the defense's letter, stating that it raises a previously rejected argument.)
DOJ-OGR-00014718.jpg
Quote #1
"In particular, the defense's letter identifies no error in the instruction the Court referred the jury to nor could they. It was a correct legal instruction when the Court instructed the jury last week, it was a correct legal instruction when the Court referred the jury to it yesterday afternoon, and that it remains true."
Source
— The Court (A ruling from the judge affirming the correctness of the jury instructions and rejecting the defense's challenge.)
DOJ-OGR-00014718.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document