DOJ-OGR-00005371.jpg
637 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
637 KB
Summary
This document is page 14 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing a proposed jury questionnaire. It poses questions to potential jurors about their impartiality, ability to follow rules regarding media, and any hardships that might prevent them from serving in a trial expected to last at least six weeks. The document also includes comments detailing a legal dispute between the Government and the Defendant over whether these specific questions are necessary.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror(s) | Potential Juror |
The document is a questionnaire directed at potential jurors for a trial.
|
| Defendant | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the comments as having proposed the questions in the 'Hardship and Ability to Serve' section and respond...
|
| Counsel | Legal Representative |
Mentioned in question 56: 'The Court and counsel recognize that jury service may be an inconvenience.'
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Government Agency |
Mentioned throughout the document as the authority presiding over the case, setting rules for jurors, and determining...
|
| Government | Government Agency |
Mentioned in a comment box as objecting to questions proposed by the Defendant.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in question 56 regarding the importance of jury service: 'Only in the United States do we rely on our fello...
|
|
|
Mentioned in question 55: 'The case must be decided solely on the basis of the evidence presented in the courtroom.'
|
Relationships (1)
The document contains a formal objection from the Government to questions proposed by the Defendant for a jury questionnaire, and a formal response from the Defendant, demonstrating their opposing positions in a legal proceeding.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document