DOJ-OGR-00005371.jpg

637 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 637 KB
Summary

This document is page 14 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing a proposed jury questionnaire. It poses questions to potential jurors about their impartiality, ability to follow rules regarding media, and any hardships that might prevent them from serving in a trial expected to last at least six weeks. The document also includes comments detailing a legal dispute between the Government and the Defendant over whether these specific questions are necessary.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Juror(s) Potential Juror
The document is a questionnaire directed at potential jurors for a trial.
Defendant Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the comments as having proposed the questions in the 'Hardship and Ability to Serve' section and respond...
Counsel Legal Representative
Mentioned in question 56: 'The Court and counsel recognize that jury service may be an inconvenience.'

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court Government Agency
Mentioned throughout the document as the authority presiding over the case, setting rules for jurors, and determining...
Government Government Agency
Mentioned in a comment box as objecting to questions proposed by the Defendant.

Timeline (1 events)

Future (expected to resume January 3d)
A trial expected to last at least six weeks, with the jury sitting from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. five days a week. The Court will not sit from December 24th through New Year's.
Courtroom

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned in question 56 regarding the importance of jury service: 'Only in the United States do we rely on our fello...
Mentioned in question 55: 'The case must be decided solely on the basis of the evidence presented in the courtroom.'

Relationships (1)

Government Adversarial / Professional Defendant
The document contains a formal objection from the Government to questions proposed by the Defendant for a jury questionnaire, and a formal response from the Defendant, demonstrating their opposing positions in a legal proceeding.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document