DOJ-OGR-00010081.jpg

431 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 431 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript of the questioning of an individual named Edelstein. The questioning focuses on Edelstein's awareness of a juror's (Catherine Conrad) past involvement in a lawsuit, information received from Theresa Trzaskoma via a Westlaw report, and the subsequent decision to hire Nardello to investigate after receiving a 'juror letter'.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness/Person being questioned
Appears to be the person being questioned in this transcript.
Catherine Conrad Juror No. 1
Mentioned as a juror who had been involved in a personal injury lawsuit.
Theresa Trzaskoma
Mentioned as someone who had seen a Westlaw report and suggested a link concerning Catherine Conrad.
Catherine M. Conrad Party to a lawsuit
Mentioned as the name indicated in a Westlaw report as a party to a lawsuit. The witness states they didn't believe t...
Nardello Investigator/Assistant
Mentioned as someone who could be called to investigate and was later called to assist in gathering information.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Westlaw Company
Mentioned as the source of a report about Catherine M. Conrad's involvement in a lawsuit.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that created the transcript.

Timeline (2 events)

Voir dire (jury selection) where it was learned that Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, had been involved in a personal injury lawsuit.
After receiving a juror letter, Edelstein called Nardello to assist in gathering information, which led to the preparation of a brief.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as a place someone could go to investigate.

Relationships (2)

Edelstein Professional Nardello
Edelstein called Nardello to assist in gathering information for the preparation of a legal brief.
Edelstein Professional Theresa Trzaskoma
Theresa Trzaskoma provided information to Edelstein (or their team) regarding a Westlaw report she had seen.

Key Quotes (4)

"You knew from the voir dire, didn't you, that the Catherine Conrad who sat as Juror No. 1 referred to being involved in a personal injury lawsuit, correct?"
Source
— Questioner (Questioning Edelstein about their prior knowledge of the juror's history.)
DOJ-OGR-00010081.jpg
Quote #1
"Did Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that document she had seen in the form of the Westlaw report had indicated Catherine M. Conrad as a party to a lawsuit?"
Source
— Questioner (Inquiring about information received from Theresa Trzaskoma regarding a Westlaw report.)
DOJ-OGR-00010081.jpg
Quote #2
"We could have done that, but we didn't believe they were the same person."
Source
— Edelstein (Responding to a question about why they didn't investigate the juror further based on the Westlaw report information.)
DOJ-OGR-00010081.jpg
Quote #3
"Now, after you received the juror letter that was sent to you, you did call Nardello in to assist you in gathering information, correct?"
Source
— Questioner (Establishing the timeline of events and the involvement of Nardello.)
DOJ-OGR-00010081.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document