DOJ-OGR-00017819.jpg
548 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
548 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and two attorneys, Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Moe, during a recess. Ms. Sternheim raises a potential issue with the government's next witness, Matt, noting that his prior statements regarding a conversation with another individual, Jane, do not fully align with the direct examination. This suggests a potential challenge to the witness's credibility or the consistency of his testimony.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, conferring with Ms. Moe and addressing the Court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, representing the government.
|
| Jane | Witness/Subject of discussion |
Mentioned in the header ("Jane - Redirect") and as a participant in a prior discussion with Matt.
|
| Matt | Witness |
Mentioned as the government's next witness, whose prior statements are being discussed.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Title used by Ms. Sternheim when addressing the Court.
|
| Honor | Judge |
Title used by Ms. Moe when addressing the Court.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim as the party offering the next witness, Matt.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing, specifically a redirect examination of a witness named Jane, followed by a discussion between the judge and attorneys during a recess.
Courtroom
2022-08-10
Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Moe conferred during a break in the court proceedings.
Court
Relationships (2)
They are opposing counsel in a court case and are documented as having conferred with each other during a break.
Key Quotes (1)
"The issue is that, at least in the 3500 material, the statements that Matt made are not -- they don't dovetail entirely with what went on on the direct examination."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Raising a concern to the judge about potential inconsistencies in the upcoming testimony of the government's witness, Matt.)
DOJ-OGR-00017819.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document