DOJ-OGR-00008404.jpg
654 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
654 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing from December 17, 2021, details a court's reasoning for excluding certain evidence from a trial involving Ms. Maxwell. The court argues that evidence proposed by the defense concerning the government's motives for the investigation—including a Miami Herald article and statements from Attorney General William Barr—would confuse and delay the trial, with its prejudicial effect outweighing its probative value. The document suggests the defense should focus on the credibility of witnesses and the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial instead.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the individual being investigated and charged by the government in a trial.
|
| William Barr | Attorney General |
Statements from him are cited as evidence the defense wishes to use regarding the government's motives for investigat...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Miami Herald | Media company |
An article from this newspaper is mentioned as evidence the defense wants to introduce, which the Court plans to excl...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed in the footer, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| The Court | Judicial Body |
Mentioned as the entity that will exclude certain evidence from the trial.
|
Timeline (2 events)
The document discusses the scope of a trial, arguing that introducing certain evidence about government motives would confuse, delay, and expand it.
The document refers to government investigations into Ms. Maxwell, which the defense argues were "hasty" and not thorough.
two different states
investigators
law enforcement
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of the "Miami Herald article".
|
Relationships (1)
The document describes the government investigating and charging Ms. Maxwell, positioning them as opposing parties in a legal trial.
Key Quotes (1)
"hasty"Source
— defense
(The document notes the defense's argument that the government's investigation was "hasty" and not thorough.)
DOJ-OGR-00008404.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document