DOJ-OGR-00013017.jpg
593 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
593 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge (THE COURT) and an attorney (MS. MOE). The discussion centers on the rules of witness sequestration, specifically concerning communications between two witnesses, Jane and Brian, who are implied to be family members. The judge questions the legality and propriety of sequestered witnesses being provided with trial transcripts, testing the boundaries of the sequestration order.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of communications with her and Brian, and being subject to recross-examination.
|
| Brian | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of communications with Jane and being subject to cross-examination about those communications.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, asking questions about witness sequestration and guidance from the government.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, responding to the court's questions.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
A term of address used by Ms. Moe when speaking to the court.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal proceeding, responsible for legal principles regarding witness communication and gu...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of sequestered witnesses not being present in it.
|
Relationships (2)
The document discusses 'communications between Jane and Brian' and immediately follows with a statement that no sequestration order 'prevents family members from talking to one another'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Did the government give any guidance?"Source
— THE COURT
(The court asking about instructions provided to sequestered witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00013017.jpg
Quote #1
"I have no awareness of whether that's occurred, your Honor."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the court's question about whether a witness was provided with a trial transcript.)
DOJ-OGR-00013017.jpg
Quote #2
"There is no sequestration order that prevents family members from talking to one another; of course, it's not best practice."Source
— MS. MOE
(Explaining the legal stance on communications between witnesses who are family members, specifically regarding Jane and Brian.)
DOJ-OGR-00013017.jpg
Quote #3
"For example, I don't think a witness could be provided, consistent with a sequestration order, the transcript of trial testimony; and I wondered if the government agreed"Source
— THE COURT
(Posing a hypothetical to test the boundaries of the witness sequestration rule.)
DOJ-OGR-00013017.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document