DOJ-OGR-00016629.jpg
575 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
575 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about admitting testimony from a witness. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that testimony about a conversation with a woman named 'Kate' regarding Jeffrey Epstein is necessary to show Kate's financial motive and bias, suggesting she is interested in a 'windfall'. The government, represented by Mr. Rohrbach, objects to this line of testimony.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, arguing to admit testimony.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, questioning the purpose of the proffered testimony.
|
| Kate | Witness |
Subject of a proposed testimony. An unnamed witness had conversations with her regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the subject of a conversation between an unnamed witness and 'Kate'.
|
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, representing the government and making an objection.
|
| Loftus |
Mentioned in the header, possibly the witness being examined ('Loftus - direct').
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| The Government | government agency |
Mentioned as having an objection to the testimony, represented by Mr. Rohrbach.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A court discussion regarding the admissibility of a witness's testimony. Ms. Sternheim argues that the testimony about conversations with 'Kate' is to show Kate's financial bias and motive, while the government objects.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
Relationships (4)
Ms. Sternheim is an attorney addressing the judge (THE COURT) in a formal court proceeding.
Mr. Rohrbach is an attorney representing the government, addressing the judge (THE COURT) in a formal court proceeding.
They represent opposing sides in a legal matter. Ms. Sternheim is offering testimony, and Mr. Rohrbach, for the government, is objecting to it.
Kate had a conversation with a witness 'regarding the subject of Jeffrey Epstein'. Ms. Sternheim's argument suggests Kate may be positioning herself as a victim for financial gain.
Key Quotes (3)
"fell right into my lap."Source
— Kate
(A quote attributed to Kate by an unnamed witness, regarding the subject of Jeffrey Epstein. This is part of the proffered testimony being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00016629.jpg
Quote #1
"It certainly shows motive and bias on the part of Kate. There is a monetary issue here."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Explaining the purpose for offering the testimony about Kate's conversation.)
DOJ-OGR-00016629.jpg
Quote #2
"It sounds more like someone who is interested in a windfall."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Characterizing Kate's alleged statement and motive, suggesting she is seeking financial gain rather than being a victim.)
DOJ-OGR-00016629.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document