DOJ-OGR-00011643.jpg
597 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
597 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge, Ms. Menninger, and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the rules for disclosing expert testimony and the scope of evidence contained on several hard drives marked as exhibits. The attorneys debate the government's representations about which documents will be used, and Mr. Rohrbach clarifies that a witness, Mr. Kelso, will testify on the general principles of document creation.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing counsel about expert testimony and disclosure requirements.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court regarding the scope of evidence, specifically 'marked exhibits' on ha...
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, clarifying the purpose of marking hard drives and the nature of Mr. Kelso's expected testi...
|
| Mr. Kelso | Witness |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as someone who will testify about general principles associated with the creation of docume...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger in the context of its notice, marked exhibits, and representations about evidence.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a court proceeding about procedural matters related to expert testimony and the handling of digital evidence (hard drives) for an upcoming trial.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
The document shows a formal interaction between a judge (THE COURT) and an attorney (MS. MENNINGER) during a legal proceeding.
The document shows a formal interaction between a judge (THE COURT) and an attorney (MR. ROHRBACH) during a legal proceeding.
They are both attorneys participating in the same court proceeding, likely representing opposing sides, as they discuss the government's evidence and representations.
Key Quotes (3)
"What I would just say is, if your expert, looking at the 3500 material and the disclosure, has different expert views, you need to notice those now."Source
— THE COURT
(Instructing counsel on the requirement to disclose changes in expert testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00011643.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, some of the "marked exhibits" are a placeholder for an entire hard drive that has any number of documents on it."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Explaining her concern about the ambiguity of what evidence the government will be referring to from the hard drives.)
DOJ-OGR-00011643.jpg
Quote #2
"Those drives are marked for identification for authentication purposes, but to the extent that the point is that Mr. Kelso is going to testify about general principles associated with the creation of documents"Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Clarifying the purpose of the marked hard drives and the scope of Mr. Kelso's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00011643.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document