021.pdf
171 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal motion (motion to exceed page limitation)
File Size:
171 KB
Summary
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 18, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers requested permission to exceed the standard 20-page limit for their upcoming motion to dismiss, citing complex legal issues regarding the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §2255 and its applicability to the alleged conduct. Plaintiff's counsel agreed to this request via telephone.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CIV-80591-KAM
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in Case No. 09-CIV-80591-KAM; moving to exceed page limit for dismissal motion
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff; Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff; Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
|
| Robert D. Critton, Jr. | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman; signed the motion
|
| Michael J. Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is filed
|
|
| Podhurst Orseck, P.A. |
Law firm representing the Plaintiff
|
|
| Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. |
Law firm representing the Defendant
|
|
| Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman |
Law firm representing the Defendant
|
Timeline (3 events)
2009-05-01
Date of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101's First Amended Complaint [DE 9]
Southern District of Florida
2009-05-18
Filing of Defendant Epstein's Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
Southern District of Florida
2009-05-26
Due date for Defendant's response to the First Amended Complaint
Southern District of Florida
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court
|
|
|
Address for Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
|
Relationships (2)
Signed as Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff v. Defendant in Case 09-CIV-80591
Key Quotes (3)
"Defendant anticipates that the legal memorandum will be approximately 30-35 pages in length."Source
021.pdf
Quote #1
"It is Defendant's position that the 2006 amended version does NOT apply to this action; rather, it is the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct that apply"Source
021.pdf
Quote #2
"Pursuant to communication by telephone, Plaintiff's counsel has no objection to the request to exceed 20 pages herein."Source
021.pdf
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document