DOJ-OGR-00010275.jpg

670 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 670 KB
Summary

This legal document is a filing, likely from the defense, arguing that Ms. Maxwell's conviction on Count Four was improper. The argument centers on a 'Jury Note' which suggests the jury may have convicted her based solely on her intent for sexual activity to occur in New Mexico, without finding intent for abuse in New York, which the defense claims constitutes a 'constructive amendment' of the indictment. The filing accuses the government of mischaracterizing the Jury Note to obscure this issue.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned throughout the document as the person convicted on Count Four, and the subject of the jury's deliberations ...
Jane Witness/Victim
Mentioned in relation to her testimony concerning conduct in New Mexico and Ms. Maxwell's alleged intent for her to b...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The government government agency
Mentioned as the opposing party in the legal case, making assertions about the jury's conviction of Ms. Maxwell.
The Court government agency
Mentioned as the judicial body that raised a point during the trial and to whom the jury submitted a note.

Timeline (2 events)

The jury convicted Ms. Maxwell on Count Four.
The defense is arguing that the jury's conviction was based on a constructive amendment of the indictment, as revealed by a Jury Note.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location of conduct described in Jane's testimony and the location where Ms. Maxwell's intent for se...
Mentioned as the location where abuse was intended to occur, according to the government's argument, and where the ju...

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell defendant-victim Jane
The document discusses Ms. Maxwell's alleged intent for Jane to be abused and to engage in sexual activity, which formed the basis of the criminal charges and the jury's deliberations.

Key Quotes (2)

"could have convicted even if no sexual abuse occurred in New York, so long as it concluded that the defendant intended for abuse to occur in New York."
Source
— The government (Quoted from the government's opposition papers (Opp. at 11-12) to describe their assertion regarding the jury's conviction.)
DOJ-OGR-00010275.jpg
Quote #1
"be found guilty"
Source
— Jury (A direct quote from the Jury Note, asking about the conditions under which Ms. Maxwell could be convicted on Count Four.)
DOJ-OGR-00010275.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document