DOJ-OGR-00000080.tif
35.4 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court filing
File Size:
35.4 KB
Summary
This document outlines legal arguments concerning Maxwell's trial, specifically addressing the District Court's handling of juror selection and a jury note related to Count Four of the Indictment. It discusses whether Maxwell could be found guilty for aiding in Jane's transportation if the intent for sexual activity was not tied to the New Mexico flight, and references a case (United States v. Ianniello) regarding juror questioning.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
did not challenge the inclusion of other jurors, motion for a new trial, contends the District Court improperly limit...
|
| Jane | Victim/Subject |
transportation of Jane's return flight, intent for Jane to engage in sexual activity
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
questioning Juror 50, Juror 50's role in deliberations
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
noted Maxwell did not challenge jurors, did not abuse its discretion, response to a jury note, determined not to resp...
|
Timeline (4 events)
Maxwell's motion for a new trial denied by District Court.
Jury deliberations during which a note was sent to the District Court.
jury
District Court
District Court's determination not to directly respond to the jury note regarding Count Four.
Hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
flight to New Mexico
|
Relationships (2)
District Court denied Maxwell's motion, Maxwell contends District Court improperly limited questioning
Key Quotes (3)
""Under Count Four (4), if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000080.tif
Quote #1
""parse factually and legally""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000080.tif
Quote #2
""[w]e leave it to the district court's discretion to decide the extent to which the parties may participate in questioning the witnesses, and whether to hold the hearing in camera.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000080.tif
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document