DOJ-OGR-00010095.jpg

414 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 414 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated March 20, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Edelstein. The Court questions the witness about a July 21 letter sent to the court, asking if her law firm would have voluntarily disclosed information about an investigation into 'Juror No. 1' without being prompted. The witness begins to affirm that they expected the information to eventually be revealed.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness
Subject of the redirect examination, addressed as Ms. Edelstein by the Court.
Mr. Schectman Attorney
An attorney questioning the witness.
Mr. Okula Attorney
An attorney present at the proceeding.
Ms. Davis Attorney
An attorney present at the proceeding, attempting to ask a question.
Ms. Brune
A person to whom a question was previously put by the Court.
Juror No. 1 Juror
The subject of an investigation mentioned in a July 21 letter.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the legal proceeding, referred to as 'your Honor'.
THE WITNESS Witness
The person being questioned, identified as Edelstein.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (2 events)

Redirect examination of witness Edelstein.
Courtroom
An investigation of Juror No. 1.

Relationships (3)

THE COURT professional Edelstein
The Court is questioning Edelstein, who is a witness in a legal proceeding.
Mr. Schectman professional Edelstein
Mr. Schectman, an attorney, is questioning the witness, Edelstein.
Ms. Davis professional THE COURT
Ms. Davis, an attorney, is addressing the Court ('your Honor') during the proceeding.

Key Quotes (2)

"Ms. Edelstein, I want to put a question to you that I put to Ms. Brune. Focusing on the July 21 letter to the Court, would your law firm have disclosed the information set forth in that letter and the investigation of Juror No. 1 if the Court had not inquired or the government failed to raise the waiver issue?"
Source
— THE COURT (The judge is questioning the witness, Ms. Edelstein, about the disclosure of information related to a juror investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00010095.jpg
Quote #1
"I think by that point, I mean, I think yes, that we had thought that it would come out at some point during --"
Source
— THE WITNESS (The witness's response to the Court's question about disclosing information.)
DOJ-OGR-00010095.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document