DOJ-OGR-00001922.jpg
649 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
649 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, where an attorney argues for a client's release. The attorney cites a 2005 opinion by Judge Orenstein in *United States v. Turner* to support the argument that while victims have a right to be heard, this right does not constitute a veto over a defendant's release, especially when conditions can be set to ensure the defendant's appearance in court.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker in court.
|
| Judge Orenstein | Judge |
Author of an opinion in the Eastern District case United States v. Turner.
|
| Turner | Party in a legal case |
Named in the case United States v. Turner.
|
| Rubin | Party in a legal case |
Named in the case United States v. Rubin.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Party in the legal cases United States v. Turner and United States v. Rubin.
|
| Eastern District | government agency |
The court district where the cases of United States v. Turner and United States v. Rubin were heard.
|
| Senate | government agency |
Mentioned in reference to its legislative history.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2005-04
Judge Orenstein issued an opinion in the case of United States v. Turner.
Eastern District
2020-12-10
A speaker, likely a defense attorney, is arguing for their client's release on conditions, citing legal precedent regarding victims' rights.
Court
your Honor
unnamed speaker (attorney)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the court that issued opinions in the cited cases.
|
Key Quotes (1)
"In considering how to ensure that the rights are afforded, I am cognizant that the new law gives crime victims a voice but not a veto. Of particular relevance to this case, a court's obligation to protect the victim's rights and to carefully consider any objections that victim may have never requires it to deny a defendant release on conditions that will adequately secure the defendant's appearance,"Source
— Judge Orenstein
(Quoted from an April 2005 opinion in the case United States v. Turner, regarding the balance between victims' rights under the CVRA and a defendant's potential for release.)
DOJ-OGR-00001922.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document