DOJ-OGR-00022088.jpg
751 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
7
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
751 KB
Summary
This legal document is a portion of a government filing arguing against a defendant's (Thomas) motion for discovery. The government contends that searching for certain records from the BOP, CIA, and Vice President's office would be an undue burden and that a draft Inspector General report is not subject to disclosure because it is not material to the defense and is protected by deliberative process privilege. The government states the report is not yet complete and the prosecution team has no involvement in its creation.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas |
A party in the legal case who is arguing for the production of an Inspector General report and whose motion is being ...
|
|
| Avellino |
Mentioned in a case citation (Avellino, 136 F.3d at 255) as a warning against actions that would paralyze criminal pr...
|
|
| Brady |
Mentioned in the context of legal requirements for disclosure (Brady rule).
|
|
| Giglio |
Mentioned in the context of legal requirements for disclosure (Giglio rule).
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Office of the Vice President | Government agency |
Mentioned as a source of records that prosecutors were required to obtain in a previous case.
|
| Central Intelligence Agency | Government agency |
Mentioned as a source of records that prosecutors were required to obtain in a previous case.
|
| BOP | Government agency |
Bureau of Prisons; the document discusses the burden of canvassing its records and a report on systemic issues within...
|
| Government | Government agency |
Refers to the prosecution in the legal case, arguing against the disclosure of certain records.
|
| Inspector General | Government agency |
The office responsible for a report that Thomas argues must be produced.
|
| MCC | Government facility |
Mentioned in relation to purported staffing shortages that a report might address. Likely the Metropolitan Correction...
|
| DOJ-OIG | Government agency |
Department of Justice - Office of the Inspector General; attorneys from this office are responsible for writing the I...
|
Timeline (2 events)
Thomas's motion for the production of an Inspector General report is being argued against and recommended for denial.
A grand jury investigation is mentioned in the context of a past case where government bodies not involved in the investigation were still required to produce records.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
District of Columbia; mentioned in a 2006 case citation.
|
Relationships (2)
The document details the Government's arguments against a motion filed by Thomas, indicating they are opposing parties in a legal proceeding.
The document states that the prosecution team has had no involvement in the writing of the Inspector General Report being prepared by attorneys from DOJ-OIG, showing a separation of duties within the government.
Key Quotes (1)
"condemn the prosecution of criminal cases to a state of paralysis."Source
— The Circuit (court)
(Quoted from the Avellino case as a warning against imposing overly burdensome discovery requirements on the government.)
DOJ-OGR-00022088.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document