DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg

543 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 543 KB
Summary

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument by an attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding the authentication of an exhibit related to 'Maxwell and Epstein'. The Court sustains an objection made by Ms. Comey, instructs the jury to disregard certain testimony, and reserves its final decision on admitting the exhibit until after hearing from a witness referred to as 'employee one'.

People (7)

Name Role Context
MS. MOE Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, arguing for the authentication of an exhibit.
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on an objection and addressing Ms. Moe.
Maxwell
Mentioned as a potential owner of a document being discussed for authentication.
Epstein
Mentioned as a potential owner of a document being discussed for authentication.
Ms. Comey Attorney
Mentioned as having made an objection that the Court sustained.
employee one Witness
A future witness whose testimony the Court will hear before ruling on the admission of an exhibit.
Alessi Witness
Mentioned in the header as the witness under direct examination.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A legal discussion occurred regarding the authentication of an exhibit. The Court sustained an objection and reserved its ruling on the exhibit's admission pending further testimony.
Courtroom (implied)

Relationships (3)

MS. MOE Professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments, to which the Court responds with rulings.
Ms. Comey Professional THE COURT
The document states that Ms. Comey made an objection which the Court sustained, a standard interaction between an attorney and a judge.
Maxwell Association Epstein
Their names are mentioned together ('Maxwell and Epstein') in reference to a document being authenticated.

Key Quotes (2)

"The question before the Court is whether this witness can authenticate this exhibit as a document belonging to Maxwell and Epstein or a document that he recognizes based on his observations of the book."
Source
— MS. MOE (Framing the legal argument for how a witness can authenticate a piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm now ruling, sustaining that objection, telling the jury to disregard that testimony. ... I may reserve until we hear the testimony of employee one."
Source
— THE COURT (Making a ruling on an objection and outlining the procedure for the potential admission of the exhibit.)
DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document